NAZIS IN AMERICA
THIS IS A PIECE WHICH I HAVE BEEN INSPIRED TO WRITE, AFTER WATCHING AMERICA GO DOWNHILL MORE AND MORE, OVER THE LAST 30 YEARS, THOUGH THE DECLINE HAS BEEN OCCURRING SINCE BACK BEFORE THAT. THIS COUNTRY IS NOTHING LIKE IT WAS 25 OR MORE YEARS AGO. THE YOUNGER GENERATIONS DON'T KNOW WHAT REAL FREEDOM IS LIKE, AND SO THEY'VE NO IDEA WHAT THEY'RE MISSING OUT ON OR WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON.
RECENTLY, I HAVE BEEN INSPIRED TO STUDY MORE INTO WHAT AMERICA IS SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT, WHAT IT HAS BEEN ABOUT AND WHERE IT IS HEADED, DUE TO VIDEOS I'VE WATCHED WHICH CONTAIN REAL NEWS AND ALL THE FACTS, COMMENTATORED BY SUCH PEOPLE AS WEBSTER TARPLEY, ALEX JONES, KRS ONE, GEORGE HUMPHREY, PROFESSOR GRIFF, JESSE VENTURA AND GERALD CELENTE, ALL OF WHOM HAVE THEIR OWN WEBSITES, RADIO SHOWS AND/OR OTHER BUSINESSES. THESE GUYS LOVE THE REAL AMERICA, BEING OPPOSED TO THE WHITE WASHED FACADE IT HAS BECOME. SADLY, IF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS WERE TO CARRY ON LIKE THEY DID DURING THE PRE REVOLUTION PROTESTS, THEY'D LIKELY BE JAILED, WHICH IS WHAT SOME BAD APPLES IN, AND WITHOUT, OUR GOVERNMENT ARE ATTEMPTING.
READ THIS THESIS, AND SEE IF YOU DON'T AGREE. IF YOU DO, DO SOMETHING TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
ALWAYS DO RESEARCH FOR YOURSELF, NO MATTER HOW SOUND THE AUTHOR IS, WHETHER FROM A VERBAL OR WRITTEN PIECE. MOST WILL TELL YOU THAT YOU SHOULD.
THIS ARTICLE IS PROTECTED BY THE 1ST AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THIS COUNTRY'S FOUNDATIONS!
NAZIS IN AMERICA
When comparing pre World War Two Germany with present day America, a distinct pattern erupts, the making of the pattern actually going as far back as President Andrew Jackson, and even being recognized as a potential problem by Thomas Jefferson, becoming a viable threat by Abraham Lincoln’s time, and turning into a full fledged menace within a few years of Dwight Eisenhower’s departure from the Presidency. (1)
If the main fabric of the pattern being presented by some of the radio talk show hosts, economic forecasters and critics of the present, and some past, administrations is as accurate as I believe the facts show that it is, then a strong possibility exists that John F. Kennedy was assassinated because he orchestrated the beginning of repairing the government, by proposing to stop the people behind the scenes, the federal reserve bank, which had apparently been staging a gradual takeover of America by means other than overtly hostile, thus far.
Now here is a general examination of a distinct, though not always sequential, pattern of the demise of rights of the people shared by Germany under Adolph Hitler, and America under some of our presidents.
Note that, in spite of the similarities listed, there are also some specific differences, though still to the same end. For example, whereas Hitler turned Germany into the Aryan minded, feared and hated war machine that it was, almost within two and a half decades by himself in power, this country’s attempted takeover by foreign power mongers has been going on for over 170 years, at least in essence, and has been being conducted more recently by a succession of at least partial puppets on a string whom, while doing the country some good in select areas, have absolutely devastated it in other, more critical areas. What has been cleverly done will contribute directly to it’s fall in the near future if we the people remain idle and silent. I do not advocate Clinton and Obama’s policies of “it’s everybody’s duty to do service to America directly”, but it’s time for all of us to pay attention to what is going on, and at least vote, and even write a letter (or email) or two to some congressmen, senators or others. We need to protest while it’s still not a crime to.
The pattern which I am revealing, caught my attention due to some information broadcast which illustrates that the real power structure of our government is not in the president nor his advisors, but in a group of people behind the scenes, which group is, along with corrupt elements of our government, taking America over financially, which will eventually be hostile, if not dealt with now.
It almost seems as if our presidents are being held captive. And maybe they really somewhat are. But if they really cared about America, they would at least start telling the truth. Extra protection is at the beck and call of every president we’ve had at least in most of our lifetimes. But, as the saying goes, “absolute power corrupts, and power corrupts absolutely”.
Adolph Hitler was born in Austria, not Germany, on the Austrian-Hungary border, both of which were countries totally separate from Germany. The name Hitler was actually a surname which Alois, Adolph’s father, took from his father by the time he was a young teen. Alois’s mother (Adolph’s Grandmother) was unwed, and her last name was Schicklgruber. Now that similarity between Hitler and Obama does not, in itself, necessarily mean anything. But what does mean something, is that Hitler probably had things influencing his agenda which were not pro Germany, which definitely played out to be so. Germany was not an evil empire or thus minded. They had a long history of internal problems, but they became the anti Semetic (also anti-Christian) empire under Hitler. And most of the atrocities were probably known to very few outside the military, except of course the Jews, whom lived in the midst of horrible things. But to the point, the only ones whom really knew that Hitler’s real last name was not Hitler, were some political opponents whom brought up the issue during Hitler's’rise to power, but the whole thing was apparently swept under the rug. So really, Hitler’s true allegiance was likely not really to Germany or her people.
Hitler’s political career began with denouncing a peace settlement which he couldn’t stand, which originated with the victors of an earlier war which Germany was involved in, and he set out to destroy that settlement. If the terrorists are not the ones whom really destroyed the buildings in New York on September 11th, 2001, which is what I believe the whole series of facts reveal, then America’s government has more or less done the same thing, or at the very least made an existing problem even worse, by committing a heinous crime which they blamed on someone else.
According to reports, Obama wants to surround Iran, Russia and Korea, plus occupy Africa, which is equivalent to breaking peace. Keep in mind that George W. Bush set the stage for much of what Obama is trying to do now. One does not have to have all of the same ideals and beliefs as his neighbors do, in order to be at peace with them. Thru some of Obama’s policies, he is trying to force everyone to adhere to what he thinks they should believe in. That’s not peace at all. It is a false front, which will eventually collapse no matter what. It’s like being forced or constrained to be nice to someone that you just can’t stand or agree with,, but sooner or later, it’s going to boil over.
After World War One, due to economic upset and very ill will towards the previous victors, the time was right for a change, and Hitler started building up the “Nazi” propaganda machine, short for the Nationalsozialistisch Deutsche Arbeiterpartei. There was a strong dislike of the republican type of government in Berlin, so that made it easier to usher in Hitler’s political party. (America is a republic, whether the party is republican, democrat, whig or independent).
Ernst Roehm recruited “strong arm” squads with which to protect the German Workers Party meetings, as well as to attack Socialists and Communists. A year later, these squads were turned into a formal, private party called the SA (sturmabteilung). Roehm protected the Bavarian government, which didn’t question his breaking of the law and agenda of intimidation. People whom are oppressed badly by corrupt cops are happy to have protection by the mob, and really just look the other way at crime the mob commits, because they’re better off than they were, even though they probably have to pay protection money. Probably more often than not, it was the mob that secretly had those people oppressed to begin with.
Obama wants to establish a civilian, national security force, yet he has appointed people like Kissinger, Holder and Pelosi, whom want to disarm the American public, even though it is proven fact that a well armed public prevents a lot of crime and also greatly reduces the chance of a hostile takeover, either by a foreign army or a domestic army. The White House has threatened senators and congressmen with martial law if they voted no on one of the bailout packages, plus he wants to see people jailed for publicly criticizing him, or for publicly criticizing beliefs other than what Obama himself apparently believes. That is outright tyranny and taking away the first amendment. Incidentally, I like one description I saw on the internet about the first amendment. The author stated, “the first amendment does not give anyone the right to free speech. What it does is to prohibit the government from taking away what is already naturally there”.
In 1921, Hitler began a program which was to cause masses of people within the Nazi political party to be loyal to him, obtained via his charisma and stated propaganda. He knew how to manipulate the masses and his charisma was a strong drawing force. Obama has done just that. And he’s attempting to make it illegal not to agree with him and his policies. They all know that they cannot take America by force, so long as the population is armed, and/or has the capability and desire to think for themselves, or ourselves. Over the years they have been slowly changing the laws, and actually making them to mean the opposite of what they were meant to mean. It’s like trying to get into someone’s house whom has a guard dog. They know they will get chewed up if they just barrel in. So first they try bribing the dog with food. That doesn’t work, so they ruin the owner’s income thru a series of legal mumbo jumbo, so the dog is undernourished, and starts taking the food bribes. Eventually they’re going to get inside and take over.
Both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama are very charismatic. Both of them had created a state of supportive hysteria amongst their supporters, almost to the point that, if told to kill the opposing parties, the people would almost do so, especially now, since government has effectively shifted the blame to groups and agendas which have nothing to do with causing the problems.
This is what Hitler did, and what is being attempted in America right now: Say you have a dog, and you treat it well, plenty of food, water exercise and attention. That’s how it should be. Something happens and you have to let someone else care for your dog. That person beats the dog, seldom feeds it and gives it stagnant, scummy water, never exercises or trains it. Some other guy comes along and takes the dog. That person feeds the dog 2 or 3 times a week, changes the water once a month, and lets the dog have some exercise every couple of weeks or so. Well, the dog figures he’s better off than he was with the last owner, which he is. But he still isn’t being done like he should, like he deserves or is entitled to. America is about to enter the stage with the second owner, if we don’t act.
In 1923, Hitler and Ludendorff tried to get other parties to start a national revolution but failed, probably thinking that it would fail and that the leaders of those parties would be sent to prison or killed, so his party would look like the only wholesome party. As it ended up, hitler did some time in jail or prison, a short time. It is interesting to note that afterwards, Hitler decided that his movement needed to achieve full power by legal methods. Clinton instituted a government, gun buy back program, which caused a lot of people to regard all gun owners as criminal or criminal minded. This was done under a false front of patriotism. George H.W. Bush ushered in the New World order, which, at least in essence, began the decline of the sovereignty of the United States of America, which again, has resulted in certain segments of society regarding true patriots as evil. This is one thing which Obama is really pushing hard, the stage for enforcing it having been prepared by George W. Bush. That is another false front, a white washed patriotism. Part of the true essence of America is it’s sovereignty from all other nations. They have somehow got people to believe that we have to be legally united with other countries in order to survive, which thought is garbage. It’s like the Amish folks. One of their barns burn down, so all the neighbors pitch and help build a new barn, then they go home. Does that make any one family less sovereign than before? Does that incident necessitate a need for every family to change their last name so that they all have the same last name? Since the others helped build a new barn, does that give the other families the right to tell the unfortunate family what to do and how to do it? The answer to those questions is no. George W. Bush and Barack Obama have both changed/sought to change laws which will destroy the Constitution, thus taking away our rights, and give foreign powers authority over us.
Hitler was a firm believer in authoritarianism, inequality(though he campaigned for equality, falsely) and the heroic virtues of war (he was a combat veteran). An authoritarian concept means advocating obedience to authority as opposed to individual liberty. George W. Bush pursued that when he passed the patriot act. Barack Obama apparently thinks that he can bully everyone into going along with his way, if he can’t win them over thru charismatic speeches full of promises that he has not only failed to keep, but totally reversed in some instances. Appointing czars whom answer only to him, thus bypassing the house and senate, is a furtherance of inequality and authoritarianism, another step closer to totalitarianism, or a dictatorship in other words. George W. Bush endorsed a grave inequality when he made a joke about the special olympics. Obamas health care reform bill is full of not only inequalities, but robbing of personal, God given rights as well. Levying fines and maybe even jail time for not accepting his health care bill? Aside from all of the obvious immoralities in it, it also reveals the hypocrisy of our government, in that some years ago they went after Microsoft for supposedly having a monopoly, yet now they want to have what is far worse than a monopoly on health care. They want to take that freedom of choice away, and then leave it up to a panel to decide who should get what treatments, if any at all, plus decide when to “put someone down”, murder them, in other words. Both Bush and Obama have glorified war. I suppose it’s easy to do when you don’t have to worry about losing body parts. I think that anyone whom watches the videos on the attack on 9/01/01 would agree that it was a self inflicted wound, orchestrated in order to invade Iraq and destabilize the economy.
Hitler’s main theme was that the state, or country, was only in existence to serve the Volk, or Aryan race, which Hitler was not even a member of. Some sources even claim that Hitler actually was part Jewish. The life giving force of the Volk was the fuehrer, whom had absolute authority, The party, or movement as it was called, was comprised of the “cream of the crop” of the Volk, whom protected the movement. Under George W. Bush’s Presidential Directive 51, absolute power was apparently given to the president, which thing was 100% unconstitutional and therefore a crime, to do. By appointing czars, Obama turned all that into a reality, if he gets his way. It is interesting to note, that Hitler was a strong advocate of national independence, being linked with Alfred Hugenburg. Hitler wanted to attain to national sovereignty and independence by casting off any kind of partnerships with other countries, and Obama is trying to make us believe that he wants national independence by linking up with a bunch of other countries. We have had a succession of presidents whom have leaned strongly towards national non independence, under a guise of obtaining national independence, which we have always had anyway. That point goes to illustrate that the same corrupt methods can be used to achieve two entirely different goals in that arena, but which ultimately end up being the same end result. What Hitler was trying to achieve with only one nation, Obama, and others, are trying to achieve in concert with many other nations. If Hitler wouldn’t’ve been stopped, it’s highly probable that he would have attempted to achieve his new order over the whole world. He would have been doing exactly what Obama is trying to do now. The biggest difference is, that instead of the Jews being the “enemy of the world”, the “enemy” now is generally Christians and other freedom lovers.
Hitler received funding from the corporations of the time, theoretically only from those within Germany, but likely from other sources as well, especially since Germany was in league with Japan and Italy. This funding, which was basically under the same principle as America’s lobbyists, enabled him to appeal to the lower middle class and the unemployed, and he duped the people into believing that Germany would aspire to greatness. Obama has filled the White House with lobbyists and financial gurus, many of which are strictly unqualified to even be in the position in which they have filled. Everyone was so fed up with Bush’s policy (in actual working) of “helping” all the other countries and starving America, it’s easy to see why Obama got elected on his rhetoric of a chicken in every pot and a Cadillac in every garage, so to speak. What he didn’t say until after election, was that the price of the chicken went from $5 to $20, and the car from $30,000 to $80,000. At the disclosing of Obama winning the election, one woman told the cameras that now she wouldn’t have to pay her mortgage. And that is probably true, because the ownership of her house will likely not end up being hers, anyway. What did he tell the people to make them believe such things?
Once Hitler got in power later, he set up an absolute dictatorship. Bush made it easy for Obama to start working on, and again, Obama furthered it by appointing czars, which is 100% illegal and un American. Bush reportedly stated that congress and the senate is merely a formality, and that the president has all the power. Obama reportedly told heads of other nations, such as Canada, that his speeches during campaign about dissolving the North American Free Trade Agreement was only talk, and that he wouldn’t have to honor that, or other, campaign promises.
In 1933, the Nazis started the Reichstag fire and made it look like it was the Communists, which enabled them to abolish guaranteed freedoms and institute a program of violence. After viewing the videos and digesting the various outlays of information on the New York attacks on 9/01/2001, I believe that the facts clearly illustrate exactly that. If anyone thinks for a moment that people in America couldn’t be that cruel and sinister, consider not only the Native Americans’ plight, but the fate of many G.I.’s during the Vietnam War. The Indians, during peaceful trading meetings, were given blankets which were laced with smallpox. Scalping was not widely done by most indians, until the White man started doing it to them, for money, man, woman or child, the same as if they were a bunch of fur bearing animals. A common tactic during war, by American forces, is to send a platoon, even a company, out to “patrol for the enemy, not being told that their real purpose was to give the enemy a target to shoot at, in order that the headquarters unit could determine just exactly where the enemy was, perhaps to also determine what type of weapons the enemy had.
In March of 1933, gathered in a church, Hitler was given full powers within the Nazi party, having been chancellor to Germany at that time. He was not yet president at that time. Though vehemently anti Semetic, Hitler apparently wasn’t opposed to an establishment of religion. That is important to note, because few of our leaders appear to be anti God, either. Most of our wars have been under a guise of duty to God, country and fellow man. It is true that once opposing nations have become mad enough to go to war, that we have fought for Godly principles, country and fellow man, but the real key lies in whom actually started any given war. There is released information now, which shows that the White House knew about the impending attack on Pearl Harbor, in time to launch a counter attack and resist it. The reason that wasn’t done, according to reports, was that if the attack was left to proceed and be implemented, the American people would support entering World War Two, whereas otherwise they would not have.
Being successful up to that point, Hitler concluded that two main points were necessary in order for him to become president and be supported by the army: retain the method of conciliation rather than revolution, and; leave the ownership of industry in the private realm, if they served the interests of the army. America has done the same thing, at least in essence, by allowing the military industrial complex to take fast hold, and that has partially been done secretly, by allowing grants and contracts only to businesses which adhere to certain secret policies of governmental entities, including investigative(intelligence) and law enforcement entities. Neither Bush nor Obama instituted that, but they have both greatly expanded various aspects of it. Attempting to curtail (abolish, really) 1st & 2nd amendment rights, creating the potential for enforcing the repealing of rights militarily, proposing fines for failure to comply with the proposed health care plan, and having people arrested for publicly stating their opinion, criticizing Obama publicly, and for exercising other rights is part of it. Most of law enforcement is turning into a semi military force, due partly on the false flag attacks on New York in 2001. It’s pretty well known now, that government has been hand in hand with big business and lobbyists for mostly big business, especially under Obama. Keep in mind, concerning big business, that there are many, many business names which are actually owned by the same, legal entity. For example, in the trucking industry, a large company will break the business down into several, smaller “sub” companies, which makes it appear like there are 5 or 6 different companies. One reason they do that is in case of, say, an accident which results in a large lawsuit which the trucking company has to pay for. By having several “smaller companies”, the whole business won’t be taken down in an event such as that.
In 1934, Hitler had Ernst Roehm, Edmund Heins, Gregor Strassor, Schleicher and quite a few others, whom opposed at least some of what he was orchestrating, executed without trial, which broke up the SA, a potential, future resistance to Hitler, Goring, Himmler and the army, the third reich. According to reports, somewhere around 50 people whom were knowledgeable of and likely opposed to Bill Clinton are dead under very mysterious circumstances, having been killed while Clinton was still in office. Arab prisoners from the Iraq War were tortured under the Bush administration, and under Obama, they are reportedly being carted away to other countries, where they are tortured (“interrogated"), in order to extract the “truth” from them. That is against the Geneva Convention, and really against human standards of morality. It is inching towards labeling any of we the American people as terrorists, if we so much as disagree openly with governmental policies.
It is more than plain to see, that especially concerning tower #7, the New York Mayor’s headquarters, as well as the offices for other government agencies and civilian corporations, that it’s collapse was most definitely a purposeful demolition job. It was apparently a way to destroy valuable corporate records which evidenced corporate fraud. By destroying those records, an effective means of resisting the financial tyranny was eliminated. And the whole thing was mass murder, accomplished with at least the consent of much of our government.
Once Hindenburg died, the chancellorship and the presidency were merged. At the same time, officers of the military and other government personnel swore allegiance to Hitler personally. Bush set the stage for this under presidential directive 51, and Obama ran with it. By appointing “czars”, whom are heads of departments of the government and answerable only to Obama, this very same thing matches exactly what Hitler did. By doing this, Obama created a means, though illegal, of bypassing the House and Senate. By accepting those positions, those people are as guilty as Obama of undermining the foundations of democracy. This act alone makes Obama a potentially ruthless dictator and extremely un American. He should be immediately arrested and impeachment proceedings started.
In Germany, as time went on, Hitler’s regime became more acceptable to the people of Germany, due to the economy recovering and unemployment going down. Those people made a grave mistake in compromising. They should have acted right then and there and ousted Hitler, putting a halt to the anti German policies, but they probably had no idea what was going to occur in the near future. I don’t think that hardly any Germans outside of the military and government even knew what all was going on until the end of the war, or shortly after. Under Bill Clinton, jobs were in abundance and unemployment was scarce. That bred apathy amongst the American people, which allowed Clinton to pass NAFTA right under everybody’s noses, including Congress, which did nothing but give Americans the shaft. Both Bush and Obama have shifted everyone’s attention away from the real issues, half starved us, and now Obama is trying to usher in a false front called Americanism. This is what was done to the Native Americans. They were starved, and abused in other ways, and more or less forced to go onto the reservations. The only other alternatives were to either starve to death or take a chance on the army hunting them down and killing them. The Chiricuaha Apaches only surrendered because they wanted to preserve their tribe, plus they missed their families. The Seminoles of Florida have never signed a peace treaty with the government. Why sign an agreement that you know the other side is never going to honor?
Because of the way Hitler designed the new offices which he created, making each one’s authority overlap onto others’, none of those authorities was able to become strong enough to challenge the absolute authority of Hitler. Presidential directive 51 likely accomplished that. It is pretty obvious, that someone whom would state that Congress and the Senate are merely formal entities (George W. Bush), seeks to establish a totalitarian regime.
Hitler expounded on his agenda in Mein Kampf, sought to reunite the peoples of Germany, and as part of his new order, set his sights on expansionism which would of course, preclude conquering other nations, especially wanting to destroy bolshevism, which was Russia’s doctrine.
Bolshevism means the majority of the people accepting views urged onto them by the country’s leader, which was Lenin in Russia at the time (which was evil also). That is just what Obama is seeking to do. This also meant that the minority had to withdraw from controlling any of the functions of the party, “temporarily”. Obama is really pushing a new world order, same sex marriage, forced government service, inhibition of free speech and freedom of the press and expression, and religions considered to be in direct opposition to Christianity, at the same time prohibiting Christian believers from promoting the faith.
Hitler was strongly opposed to Marxism, which America’s government is supposedly against, but the U.S. Government has endorsed the same banking policy which Marxism endorses
Hitler used the power of propaganda to make other nations believe that he was a man of peace, posing as a type of savior of Europe against bolshevism. George W. Bush made the world believe that terrorists were the only possibility of being the cause of the New York attack, even urging America to not even consider any other source. In the course of pursuing the “attackers”, the White House not only violated the Geneva Convention, but tremendously curbed the rights of Americans as well. Obama is posing as some type of savior of the world, when in fact he is destroying America, having been given a jump start by some of Bush’s policies. Between Bush and Obama,along with a few previously instituted policies, they have set the stage for some of the worst inequalities known to man since possibly Nero’s time, and certainly since Lenin’s time.
Bush snuck some unconstitutional laws into effect, and Obama is clearly and rather blatantly trying to bully some unconstitutional laws into effect, which will destroy the greatest system of equality, rights, freedom and protection that has ever been a foundation of a nation, under a guise of peace and integrity. Obama wants to give Interpol the freedom to operate within the United States, unhindered by either the Constitution or any of our laws. That is setting the stage for an eventual hostile takeover.
Bill Clinton attempted to give our national parks to the U.N., an outright setting for foreign occupation. Hitler, like some of our leaders, claimed that Germany’s program of expansionism was limited, yet in march of 1935 he instituted conscription, placing troops back in the Rhineland, using as an excuse the pact between Russia and France. Apparently, Obama wants to more or less surround Korea, Iran and Russia, plus occupy Africa.
Just as Obama did soon after taking power, Hitler replaced people in key positions whom disagreed any at all with the Nazi’s policy, with those whom believed in it wholeheartedly.
As time progressed, Hitler began to believe that he was infallible and started pushing his plans harder and faster, often against the advice of his staff. Bush was reportedly told by his father, George H.W. Bush, not to go to war in Iraq, but he did anyway. Many of his later speeches suggested that he took on himself an air of infallibility and above reproach, and Obama appears to be of the same mind. Just as Hitler almost hypnotized his supporters, so has Obama. And now they’re intimidated, full of remorse for having been gullible enough to believe that he would honor his campaign promises which, as evidence at least suggests, he never had any intention of keeping in the first place.
Hitler’s main thesis was Aryanism, which means a superior caste of the human race, a supposedly pure, caucasion bloodline, which also means, predominantly, without any Jewish blood at all. This originated in a man named Arius, whom apparently was a Christian believer at one time, within 200 or so years after the death of Christ. But he ended up rejecting Christianity’s main belief, that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. His doctrines taught that Jesus Christ was not the eternal Son of God, thus it is anti Christian, and it subtilly remained in the state church up until around 381 A.D., when that doctrine was rejected. But it was renewed amongst the Germanic tribes during the great migrations, and never died out completely, as a false form of Christian doctrine.
Whether George W. Bush knew the truth about the New York attacks may be questionable, but he sure jumped on the bandwagon to go after the Arabs, even though Osama bin Laden aired a statement within a few days of the attacks, stating that he had been living under a set of rules, imposed by his leader, which forbad him to undergo operations of that nature or magnitude. The terrorists have never failed to claim responsibility for something that they did. There have even been times where a couple different groups have quarrelled over who got to claim the responsibility for a terrorist act. So why, if the terrorists were responsible for 9/01/2001, would they not only distance themselves from the whole thing, but also air a broadcast stating that they did not do it? Apparently, Bin Laden didn’t say that he wouldn’t do something like that, only that he didn’t do it, not having been allowed to.
In spite of Bush’s blatant violations of constitutional law, he upheld certain Godly principles, which Obama reversed as soon as he got into office. And Obama is, in fact, trying to force Americans to accept many different forms of anti Christian, and otherwise anti Godly, policies, under a guise of peace.
America is being brainwashed, de Christianized and robbed. Not even an atheist, whom knows history, can refute the fact that a nation in which Christian principles are upheld, has been a blessing to the whole nation. This is in direct opposition to countries which uphold no Christian principles, and the corruption in government and business run rampant, destroying both the innocent and the guilty. Every person in America is certainly entitled to practice any religion they so please, but Islam in particular does have world domination as one of it’s goals, and if they have the lack of tolerance for Christianity that it is said that they have, why would an American president endorse that religion, and seek to cast down Christianity. Even though Christian believers would like to see the whole world become Christian, they don’t consider threat of force as a viable tool with which to evangelize. No, Obama is not a man of peace.
The whole new world order is a gigantic farce. I think that most Americans have at least a general belief in the Bible, but the way the new world order will be ushered in, is thru a perversion of certain scriptures, the main one being the millineum reign of Christ. We are not in the millineum, and likely not even all that close to it. There are still some major prophecies yet to be fulfilled before that time comes. And when it does, the Bible specifically says that Christ will set foot on the Mount of Olives, and He will appear as He is, not in the form of some other man. When that 1,000 year time period comes, it will be ushered in by God, not the doings of man. God is the same yesterday, today and forever. The concepts He expected to be followed 2,000 years ago, He expects always.
Authored by Todd Slee, Roann, IN
Credits: Information about our leaders’ policies from the video “The Obama Deception, by infowars.com
History on Adolph Hitler from Encyclopedia Britannica, 1959
SEE BELOW NEXT PARAGRAPH FOR MORE LINKS & RESOURCES
OPERATION VALKYRIE: THE STAUFFENBERG PLOT TO KILL HITLER. THIS IS A LINK TO A WRITTEN HISTORICAL ACCOUNT. THE EXCERPT BELOW DESCRIBES A DOCUMENTARY FILM WHICH I CAN'T LOCATE RIGHT NOW.
THIS IS A DOCUMENTARY COMPRISED OF ACTUAL FOOTAGE AS WELL AS PERSONAL INTERVIEWS WITH SURVIVIING PARTICIPANTS OF WORLD WAR TWO AND/OR RELATIVES OF THOSE PEOPLE. THE LAST SURVIVING MEMBER OF THE INNER CIRCLE OF GERMAN PATRIOTS WHOM PLOTTED TO KILL HITLER IS SHOWN IN SEVERAL INTERVIEWS. OF SPECIAL INTEREST IS HOME MOVIES OF EVA BRAUN, ADOLPH HITLER AND THEIR ASSOCIATES. WE HAVE A TENDENCY TO CONSIDER PEOPLE LIKE HITLER TO BE COLD, ALOOF AND DISTANT FROM OTHER PEOPLE WHEN, IN FACT, THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE. HITLER HAD A FAVORITE DOG, WAS WELL LIKED BY MANY, APPARENTLY HAD A VERY PERSONABLE ATTITUDE AND PERSONALITY, AND HIS FRIENDS' CHILDREN LIKED HIM AS WELL. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT, BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE USUALLY FOOLED BY SOMEONE WHOM IS PERSONABLE, AFFECTIONATE AND CHARISMATIC. THEREFORE, WE ARE LED TO THINK THAT SOMEONE LIKE BARACK OBAMA, GEORGE BUSH, FRANKLIN ROOSEVELT, NANCY PELOSI, TIMOTHY GEITNER, HENRY KISSINGER AND OTHERS, WOULD NEVER DO UNDERHANDED THINGS WHICH WOULD DECEIVE AND HURT AMERICANS. A KEY TO BILKING PEOPLE IS TO WIN THEIR HEARTS, THRU DECEPTION. AN ANTI-SOCIAL PERSON WOULD NEVER ACCOMPLISH WHAT HITLER, AND OTHER DESPOTS, HAVE DONE.
AS OF TODAY, APRIL 8th, 2010, SO LONG AS WE KEEP ABREAST OF WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON, PROTEST THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTS, EXPOSE THE WRONGS AND WRONGDOERS, AND VOTE ACCORDING TO A CLEAN CONSCIENCE, COME NOVEMBER WE HAVE A GOOD CHANCE OF BEGINNING THE PROCESS OF RESTORING AMERICA.
DID GEORGE W. BUSH SET THE PRESIDENCY UP TO BE A DICTATORSHIP?
NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/NSPD 51
a/k/a Homeland Security Presidential Directive/HSPD-20
Article 'Socialist Methods of Government Investigators' Below This Main Article
Copyright 2013. Slee Canine Training & Security. All rights reserved.
Type your paragraph here.
Socialist Methods of Government Investigators and Informants
I am going to try and expound on everything I know about how government investigators function, in a general outlay. I am all for law and order, as I'm sure that most people are. However, an abundance of misuse of authority and abuse of information is constantly occurring, in an attempt to not only curtail our Constitutional and Civil Rights, but to completely control all citizens of the United States of America and cause each and every person to be totally subservient to the state [government].
One of the biggest fallacies being implemented by police nation-wide is reasonable suspicion, which has been twisted into an excuse to pry into an innocent person's life. Anyone who is a free thinker, liberty-minded and in favor of all of the freedoms guaranteed under the Constitution of the United States of America, is a potential target of Socialist and totalitarian minded control gurus. Truly sincere Christian evangelicals are also subject to scrutiny by the forces of the so-called New World Order, first mentioned as such in America by George H.W. Bush, in a public speech.
Reasonable suspicion is often a farce, a misguided protocol which can make a perfectly innocent person appear to fit into the same mold as a criminal. They use the same type of methodology as job interviewers do, when analyzing a prospective employee. Are they nervous? Do they avoid direct eye contact? Are they restless, fidgety, tired appearing? These and other signals and indicators are used to help decide whether to hire or not.
The problem is, a person can exhibit the same evidences as someone who an employer may not want to hire, yet be a desirable worker. Maybe the person needs a job quite badly and is stressed from anxiety over the unknown. Some people are shy and avoid eye contact because they feel inferior to certain others, or else they don't want to seem intimidating. Maybe they've been turned down so many times that they figure that time will be another and insecurity has reigned. They could have been straining their self doing low paying odd jobs and are tired. Many possibilities.
It is the same way with people and the police. I know a lot of people who are perfectly law abiding, yet become nervous around a police officer. Part of that reason is because a lot of cops believe that everyone is guilty of some crime, whether small or large, and thus maintain a vindictive, domineering and intrusive demeanor and mindset. Police commanders often have to deal with that issue with their underlings.
If they're after a particular person, especially a whistleblower against police corruption, preparations are sometimes made in readiness for an attempted bust, preceded by a program of harassment, intimidation and demeaning activity, designed to break a person's spirit or at least break down their “defenses”, in order to more easily manipulate them.
They may have informants do things at night by which to cost their target sleep, or they may send word to other people in law enforcement that so and so is suspected of some criminal activity or other deviant action, so that it helps ensure that a degree of anxiety is created. If an employer and fellow workers think that someone is being investigated for crime, they will act differently around the alleged culprit, thus treat them in an abnormal manner.
A favorite trick of law enforcement and D.O.J. personnel is to show up at some place the victim frequents, sometimes appearing at the person's place of employ, flash a badge, mention the name of their quarry, and often, the person is either fired unjustly or ostracized little by little and picked on, eventually losing their job.
I've seen co-workers conspire with dirty cops, often not realizing that a wrong is being initiated, and perform small ploys by which to effectually either entrap or frame, the scapegoat. It could be for theft, sexual or other harassment, any number of things.
Ways to spot this is to gauge each situation and your peers' demeanor. If they start behaving differently toward or around you, something is amiss. When so, it is generally followed by stunts to curtail your productivity, disrupt your serenity or even cause you to blow your top, cleverly orchestrated so as to make you look like the cause or instigator of the problem. Much of that is done behind a guise of “roping” [an investigative term], but methods are wrongly and otherwise falsely applied, little white lies are told and whammo!, presto frame-o. They call a lot of operations stings which are, in reality, trumped up, staged beforehand and are instances of illegal entrapments, implementing sleight of hand schemes which prep the rube to become like one of Pavlov's Dogs [see 'The Crypto Thesis'].
Many of their protocols now are not nearly as verbal or written instructions, or questioning, as they are intimations, allusion and innuendo. For example, some cop has it in for someone, a person who has not been into crime, but is outspoken against corruption in government, very patriotic and/or truly evangelical Christin. The cop goes around and starts asking people about that person, and when asked if they've done something wrong, instead of outright lying and stating a bold face lie, the cop may say, “Well,,,', or “We'll get 'im”, something along that line. Cops know exactly what that does to someone; garners suspicion from others, distrust, castigation, distancing, ostracization, and so forth. F.B.I. people are especially bad about that when they get crooked. It is intent to deceive and if not a crime itself, due to it's repercussions, is a crime.
Bogus cops and agents pull tricks like that all the time, often learning spiritual laws from church people, the false ones teaching them how to abuse/misuse those laws. Cops and especially federal agents, particularly F.B.I., are taught a variety of psychological ploys, frequently twisting and mishandling situations, instigating crime by provoking subjects. To the extreme, I've no doubt that many of the active shooter killers we hear about were dogged out, covertly, and pushed way beyond what anyone ought to be pushed for any reason. The 'Navy Yard' shooter is a prime example.
When I was an F.B.I. street agent in Colorado, my superior had a dark spell and wanted me to craftily harass a subject, thereby provoking him, even though they already had the goods on him but were waiting to make an arrest. Sound like an unknown space between a culprit's crime and an eventual shootout with authorities or a killing spree upon civilians, giving cops or agents a reason to just kill someone?
I refused, instead telling the guy who and what I was, and exactly what I was supposed to do, also urging him to turn himself in, do his time and get it over with. That was one of the factories I was placed in for undercover duty. He ended up being arrested, but was thankful that I filled him in. That was my true duty in that circumstance.
It's common for a cop or agent to deceive friends, co-workers and if possible, family members, into agitating their target, usually hidden within a white-washed facade. For instance, if the intended victim is a combat veteran or has been through some other type of traumatic experience, the officer may tell people that the person of interest is being tested for stability under stress, to make sure that they won't come “unglued” when under duress. What that amounts to is a clever provocation and, again, I'm sure that many of the shooters of innocent people have been dealt with in like manner, and worse.
There are a variety of devices which are actually weapons, subject to misuse. Some years ago a sheriff's deputy told me that S.W.A.T. Teams have a piece of equipment which invisibly immobilizes a person, even in a crowd, via some type of sonar or microwave emittance. It is designed for use against hostage takers and shooters, but can just as easily be implemented against anyone.
Those appliances can be for stopping an individual, or a large group of people, and it was leaked that a gadget like that was used against Iraqi forces during the first Gulf War, being the reason for droves of enemy soldiers just giving up and abandoning their posts, willingly being taken prisoner by American troops. There were denials of such a weapon being used, but it's effects were vividly illustrated by an investigative reporter on '60 Minutes'.
Concerning groups of people, there is a contrivance being used in America, resulting in an intangible force, culminating in a type of behavioral control. The Indiana State Police utilize it, as does the F.B.I., and to a lesser extent the sheriff's department and the city police, and elements of the world of outlaws also do, and it involves the highway, creating potential traffic hazards and setting the stage for “road rage”.
After making a report to any of those entities, what often happens is that you see the culprits you've reported out on the highway, driving in the direction opposite to the way you are traveling, which is a form of psychological warfare, particularly when it happens over and over again.
I was told by the State Police that it is a way of fulfilling the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America: “...the accused shall enjoy the right...to be confronted with the witnesses against him...”. In reality, it is nothing but harassment and intimidation, and it happens quite a bit of the time with some of those people driving vehicles with darkly tinted windows.
F.B.I. Special Agent [ret.] Neil Hoener told me, in 1994, that the practice is standard protocol. I don't think that he favored the way, never stooping to that level of unprofessionalism and lack of ethics, but that's what was said. It is, in addition to what is stated above, a security glitch on the part of the instigators of such methods, by betraying who is working with any given entity, and it is a bullying tactic, quite cowardly.
Another mode of harassment and control is a misguided feature of covert investigating. After relaying information to an entity, for assistance in undercover work, detectives, informants and/or operatives will begin to appear here and there, checking out the items you've reported. Sometimes they will drop a hint or two verbally, but usually, anymore, they make innuendo, intimation or allusion, as much by body language as anything, supposedly so that you know your summary of the problem is being looked into.
Those types of indications can be helpful, but those signs do not really fill you in as much as they at first seem to. Such means garner more questions and produce more suspicion than what was already present. Those people, who are seemingly from the entity you've conficed in, could be anyone, from either side of the law or issue. Phones are easily tapped, computers are effortlessly monitored, and any observant, clever and discerning person can fairly easily infiltrate a system which is not based upon verbal and written communication and knowing who all of the team “players” are.
Not only that, but it is an arrangement by which participants are handily manipulated, critical data is kept hidden and control over persons on both sides of the law is gained, especially when no real arrests are made or suspects tried in court [much investigating now ends up with law enforcement/D.O.J. gaining more informants/other undercover people, who are used to pry into nearly all citizens' lives, attempting to exert major control over all facets of American life].
One way that cases are skewed, competent investigators kept in the dark and Constitutional concepts thwarted is by the illicit use of proxies. A proxy, in investigating, is simply a stand-in, and when used properly is a viable and justifiable means to security and more effective detection of crime. A proxy can be someone who is a close resemblance of the actual, original investigator or it can be a person who looks nothing like that person.
One problem with the use of proxies, is that there have been many occasions of a proxy being used in place of someone who isn't even aware that there is a proxy for them. The dilemma is complicated when the proxy bears resemblance to the other person That happens to both government and civilians alike, and it is used to deceive.
Police and even D.O.J. personnel sometimes, when a desired participant in an operation will not relent and take part, install a stand-in for that person, which fools others into thinking that the unwilling person is a part of the authorities' operation. That is kept hidden from the original person, and an allusion is created. If people who know the desired person believe that they are taking part in something they aren't, then it is easier for nefarious authorities to gain support from family and friends of the unwilling partaker, and that is one way by which people are swayed to accept unconstitutional and Socialist agendas. After all, think some, if so and so is abiding by such and such a thing, then it must be okay.
I seem to catch a lot of disdain from people, for berating some of the activities of police and D.O.J., but most people have no problem when politicians and undesirable statutes they enact are browbeat. The dilemma is, just who do people think are/will be enforcing freedom and liberty curbing laws? Obviously it is the police and D.O.J., as well as departments such as the I.R.S. The concept is simple: as long as the populace is well armed, the government and it's civilian subsidiaries cannot take society over by force, and many military people will not attempt to, nor all cops and feds. However, just as in the days of the Old West, they orchestrated a war of attrition against the Native Americans. That is the biggest obstacle to restoring the Constitution. In America now, it is being done via legislation.
When Obama came into power, that provided fuel for the fire of Socialism, which was largely the mindset of the western expansionists, though it wasn't known as a distinct political theme. But two main points should be noted about that: they were seeking a new and better world, and; they believed that the end justified the means, which was fraud and theft against the Native Americans as well as murdering them, and taking over the Black slave trade from the Spaniards. Nothing has changed except the methods and the victims.
Back then, the idea was that if the settlers couldnt reform the Native Americans to the expansionists' ways, then they would force them into submission by starvation, or murder them, same mindset as the Muslims Quran states. Nowadays, same thing, except in a more passive manner.
This concept is the first platform by which to indoctrinate the dogma of neutrality, which hate crimes are based upon. There is no crime covered under the “hate crime” laws which was not already listed as a crime. The real plan behind that is to cause Americans to forsake heartfelt beliefs, those laws attempting to prevent people from speaking their conscience and heart, thus destroying true religion. While some thoughts and actions, such as bigotry and bullying, ought not to be, there are a variety of actions which should be spoken against, but the Obama administration sought to abolish free speech and freedom of the press, as well as free thought.
As if that isn't bad enough, we now have a semi-major push by religionists [not genuine Christians] to reinstate, in a more passive manner, the merging of church and state which prevailed during the Dark and Middle Ages. That was the root of a major social and religious agenda that Obama pushed, in a surreptitious and clever way: the thesis that truth is relative. In other words, Marxists, Socialists and Communists believe that there is no absolute truth.
There is a very high incidence rate in Wabash County, Indiana, and likely here and there nation-wide, of undue and extensive correlation between law enforcement/D.O.J. entities and churches, not just random members, but large numbers of congregations and even entire parishes. Given that an alarming number of church members think that church attendance should be mandatory in America, some even believing that people who won't adhere to Biblical doctrines should be extirminated, this is a very serious issue, which will make the 'Salem Witch Hunts' seem trivial and will be a much more horrible remake of the situation which existed before the 'Reformations'.
If the drive for a Biblical-based reform by so-called evangelicals succeeds, particularly one which contains denominational agendas or even modern day Gospel precepts, it will eventually culminate in a religious dictatorship, with churchmen running the government as though it were a church, which itself as a whole is more politically correct and Socialist-based these days. Having devout Christian believers with the proper, Constitutional outlook and freedom and liberty oriented mindset is well, alongside free thinkers who are of any given religion, if any. But when a person, or group of persons, is in charge who lean toward a select platform only, trouble arises.
The idea of America is freedom and liberty to choose for one's self, not a forced subservience. I believe that the Christian way, when genuinely adhered to, is the right way. However, it has no place in running a secular government, though the precepts and concepts contained in the Old Testament, ones which are common to all or most cultures, are a proper way to govern a nation. Looking throughout history, there is no instance of success when an organized religion, including Christianity, attempts to govern the people. Nor does any writer in the Bible condone or even hint of such a practice.
There is one specific church in Wabash County, which is/has been likely used as a partial safehouse, having ties with corrupt U.S. Marshals and a far left/right “constitutional” group, which seeks out people who oppose them openly and vehemently, and conducts covert programs against them, in order to “straighten them out”. Gone full bore with a large segment of parishes in the United States, that would be a medium by which to either indoctrinate and brainwash people into going along with a religio/politico theme, or to get rid of dissenters entirely. That is in coincidence with all of the lukewarm and otherwise false theologies present in the current church world in America today.
It also appears that churchmen have been placed into positions of leadership and management of informant networks, which is relegated, at least to an extent, to civilian persons who have gradually been elevated to a higher position on the proverbial totem pole, within the informant networks. When active church members take part in covert activity, or in overt activity, implementing denominational doctrine as a foundation for running governmental functions, it is in itself a blatant violation of Constitutional concepts. That is especially so when a number of parish members are involved, because most will lean toward church dogma, rather than utilizing true Constitutional protocols.
There are a number of indications via which one can determine if a person is working undercover for one or another governmental or civilian entities, and unless a highly skilled and experienced covert operator is encountered, the signs generally become obvious. This is not to say that all are corrupt or scandalous, not by any means, but a lot of abuse of authority reigns, as well as misuse of information and mishandling of underlings.
There is a major push now, to strive for what a large number of people believe will be a better world, instigated by proponents of the “New World Order”, which is a white-washed introduction to Socialism, which is merely soft-core Communism, and a forerunner to same.